Chilling Effects
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Topic HomeFAQsMonitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
 Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Copyright > Notices > Audi and Volkswagen Logo Infringment Printer-friendly version

Audi and Volkswagen Logo Infringment

January 7, 2008

 

Sender Information:
howard, phillips, and anderson
Sent by: [Private]
h,p and a
salt lake city, utah, 84102, USA

Recipient Information:
[Private]
c and b tuning
colorado springs, colorado, 80909, usa


Sent via: mail and email
Re: infringement and dilution of VW and AUDI trademarks

LAW OFFICES
HOWARD, PHILLIPS & ANDERSEN
GREGORY D. PHILLIPS [Sender Contact Information]
E-Mail:[Sender e-mail]
January 7, 2008
VIA E-MAIL ([Recipient E-mail]) and FIRST CLASS MAIL
Benjamin A. Bonner C and B Tuning [Recipient Address]
Re: C AND B TUNING ? Infringement & Dilution of VW and Audi Trademarks Dear Mr. Bonner:
This law firm represents Volkswagen of America, Inc. ("VWoA") in trademark enforcement actions. VWoA is a subsidiary of Volkswagen AG and the exclusive U.S. importer of cars manufactured by Volkswagen AG and Audi AG (collectively "VW"). As such, VWoA is charged with protecting the trademarks associated with VW automobiles.
VW takes protection of its trademark rights very seriously, and has obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions against infringers who use VW trademarks without authorization.
The VW EMBLEM?, AUDI RINGS?, and AUDI STYLIZED? design trademarks or logos (collectively the "VW Marks") are duly registered trademarks in the United States that belong to VW. Commercial use of the VW Marks, or any confusingly similar variations thereof, without the express written consent of VW violates state and federal law7, is misleading to the public, and constitutes a misappropriation of the goodwill and reputation developed by VW.
You are violating VW's trademark rights by using the VW Marks on your business cards without VW's authorization. The law is well settled that one person or entity may not use the trademarks of another without authorization. See, e.g., Volkswagen AG v. Uptown Motors. 1995 WL 605605 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (enjoining use of VW EMBLEM? and AUDI RINGS? design trademarks in business telephone directory ads); Harlev-Davidson. Inc. v. Grottanelli, 164 F.3d 806 (2d Cir. 1999) (enjoining unauthorized use of manufacturer's "bar-and-shield" logo in signage and in advertisements); Harlev-Davidson Motor Co. v. Iron Eagle of Central Florida, Inc., 973 F. Supp. 1421 (M.D. Fla. 1997) (enjoining use of "winged logo" in advertisements and signage). An image depicting the unauthorized use of the VW EMBLEM?, AUDI RINGS?, and AUDI STYLIZED? design trademarks or logos on your business cards is shown below for your reference:
Benjamin Bonner January 7, 2008 Page 2



[here on my business card i have a picture of a vw and audi emblem]


C and B Tuning , [Recipient Address]
specializing in VW and Audi repair with over 15 years of combined experience: Ben Bonner

Unauthorized use of the VW EMBLEM?,
AUDI RINGS?, and AUDI STYLIZED?
design trademarks

Compare to U.S. Registered Trademark Nos. 3,032,408 and 2,073,484


[actual picture of VW and AUDI emblems to compare to mine are here]


This letter is intended to secure your voluntary agreement to cease from violating VW's intellectual property rights. VW requires that you sign and return the below-attached Agreement to our office by no later than January 23,2008. If we have not received a signed copy of the Agreement from you by the close of business on that day, including the required information and payment, we will infer that you will not resolve this matter voluntarily and we will advise VW to file a complaint against you.
This letter is without prejudice to the rights of VW, all of which are expressly reserved.
Should you have any questions concerning VW's position in this matter, please contact Jason Eves in our office at [Sender Contact].
Very truly yours,



Gregory D. Phillips

GDP:jpe
cc: Volkswagen of America
Benjamin Bonner January 7, 2008 Page3
AGREEMENT
By execution of this Agreement, [Recipients], individually and as owners of C and B Tuning (collectively "CAB"), agree to permanently and immediately cease and desist from all unauthorized uses of copyrights, trademarks, and intellectual property-owned by Volkswagen AG and Audi AG (collectively the "VW Marks") in their products, services, advertisements, business cards, promotional literature, promotional telecasts, broadcasts, and signage. on the Internet, or otherwise, in connection with the advertisement or sale of any product, part, good, or service.
Specifically, by way of illustration and without limiting the general agreement expressed above, CAB agree that, on or before January 23,2008, they will:
(1) cease using the VW Marks in any manner except as outlined in VW's Trademark
Usage Guide, attached.
(2) provide evidence to counsel for VW that any signage, business cards, or
advertising that is not currently in conformance with VW's Trademark Usage Guide has been
changed to comply with this Agreement.
(3) pay VW damages and attorney fees in the amount of $2,500, by cashier's check,
made payable to Volkswagen of America, Inc.
CAB agree and acknowledge that any violation or breach of this Agreement will cause irreparable harm to VW, and that VW will be entitled to entry of both a preliminary and permanent injunction against CAB for any violation of this Agreement, as well as any other remedy allowed by law. CAB further agree that if they breache this Agreement they will pay all costs incurred by VW in enforcing this Agreement including reasonable attorney fees.
CAB agree that the terms set forth in this Agreement are binding on CAB and their partners, employees, agents, and any other persons or entities acting for or in concert with CAB. CAB further agree that they shall not participate in or otherwise aid or assist any other person or entity in carrying out any acts that CAB covenant not to do in the paragraphs set forth above.
AGREED TO:
C AND B TUNING
Signed:
[Recipient], Individually and as Co-Owner of C and B Tuning
Signed:
[Recipient], Individually and as Co-Owner of C and B Tuning
Date:
Trademark Usage Guide
Volkswagen of America, Inc. ("VWoA") is a subsidiary of and the exclusive U.S. importer of cars manufactured by Volkswagen AG ("VWAG") and as such, VWoA is charged with protecting trademarks associated with those cars. VWAG or VWoA own and use the following words, letters and symbols, among others, as trademarks, service marks and trade names.
(NOTE: These are only examples; there is a long list of trademarks owned by VWAG and VWoA.)


Drivers wonted
s
The word: VOLKSWAGEN The letters: VW
The symbol consisting
of the letters VW
vertically arranged
within a circle:
The advertising tag
line with or without
the circle logo:


The vehicle names:

BEETLE, NEW BEETLE, JETTA, PASSAT, GOLF, GTI, EUROVAN



The New Beetle logo:
The New Beetle Design
The classic Beetle Design

These marks have been registered or submitted for registration by VWAG or VWoA in the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). Several of these marks are registered in the color blue as well as black. These registrations cover not only the use of these marks in the color blue, but in any other color as well.
The numbers of the USPTO Principal Register registrations are: 617,131; 631,649; 653,695; 790,621; 791,311; 804,869; 808,381; 815,632; 819,297; 2,059,841. Other registered trademarks of VWAG in the USPTO include, but are not limited to: BEETLE 1,014,346; BUG 1,088,911; JETTA 1,176,044; PASSAT 1,468,206; GOLF 1,361,724; GTI 1,540, 381; EUROVAN 1,512,598.
VWoA will object to any use whatever of a trademark or service mark belonging to VWAG or VWoA and used as the name of, or as the means of identifying, any
business, Internet domain name, website, service or product not having its source in VWAG, one of its subsidiaries, or one of its licensees. Equally, objection will be raised to any use for these purposes of a part of any such mark (e.g. Volks), or of the likeness of a Volkswagen vehicle, or of any word or expression synonymous in the popular mind with Volkswagen as, for example, Bug or Beetle, as the name of or as the means of identifying any business, Internet domain name; website; the service, sale or repair of Volkswagen vehicles; or of parts or accessories for such vehicles. VWoA will also object to the use of the encircled VW logo as a decoration or link button on any Internet website not having its source in VWAG, one of its subsidiaries, or one of its licensees.
Examples of infringing and objectionable uses of Volkswagen trademarks are:
(1) Use of a mark as part of a trade name, domain name, or corporate
name, such as Volks City; Old Volks Home; Volkswagen Center;
www.johnsvw.com; www.Ilovevolkswagens.com; or by a business specializing
in the sale or repair of Volkswagen products, The New Beetle Shop.
(2) Use of the mark alone or set off from its background, or dominating its
surroundings by reason of size, color or style of lettering, such as a sign reading
VOLKSWAGEN.
(3) Use of the mark as an adjective to qualify or designate services, as, for
instance, Volkswagen Sales.
(4) Use of the mark as an adjective to qualify or designate services, as, for
instance, Volkswagen Service or Volkswagen Repair.
(5) Use of the mark as an adjective to qualify or designate goods, as, for
instance, Volkswagen Parts, unless such goods have their source with or are
expressly licensed by VWAG.
On the other hand, VWAG does not want to interfere in any way with the right of any person engaged in the sale or repair of Volkswagen products to advise the public of this fact in a fashion that is not misleading. Accordingly, there is no objection to the use of Volkswagen (or its equivalent, the initials VW) provided all of the following conditions are met:
(a) Volkswagen is used denotatively as part of an informational statement
referring to Volkswagen products, as, for instance, in We Sell Volkswagen
Automobiles; Repair of Volkswagen Vehicles; or Parts for Volkswagen Cars;
(b) "Volkswagen" is not set out either alone or in type face, mounting,
spacing, illumination, format or material contrasting with or larger than the
surrounding text, nor in Memphis Bold lettering, nor in a color combination involving
blue; and
(c) "Volkswagen" is not displayed in such a way that members of the
public are likely to regard it as a trade name or as part of a trade name.
LICENSING
VWoA has a licensing program in place for enthusiast websites and clubs. If you fit these categories and are interested in being licensed, please visit us at www.vw.com to review the application requirements.
If you wish to manufacture products that include our trademarks, you must complete a merchandise license application and submit it directly to VWAG. To request a merchandise license application, please send your e-mail request to VWTrademarks@vw.com

 
FAQ: Questions and Answers

[back to notice text]


Question: What can be protected as a trademark?

Answer: You can protect

  • names (such as company names, product names)
  • domain names if they label a product or service
  • images
  • symbols
  • logos
  • slogans or phrases
  • colors
  • product design
  • product packaging (known as trade dress)


[back to notice text]


Question: What exactly are the rights a trademark owner has?

Answer: In the US, trademark rights come from actual use of the mark to label one's services or products or they come from filing an application with the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) that states an intention to use the mark in future commerce. In most foreign countries, trademarks are valid only upon registration.

There are two trademark rights: the right to use (or authorize use) and the right to register.

The person who establishes priority rights in a mark gains the exclusive right to use it to label or identify their goods or services, and to authorize others to do so. According to the Lanham Act, determining who has priority rights in a mark involves establishing who was the first to use it to identify his/her goods.

The PTO determines who has the right to register the mark. Someone who registers a trademark with the intent to use it gains "constructive use" when he/she begins using it, which entitles him/her to nationwide priority in the mark. However, if two users claim ownership of the same mark (or similar marks) at the same time, and neither has registered it, a court must decide who has the right to the mark. The court can issue an injunction (a ruling that requires other people to stop using the mark) or award damages if people other than the owner use the trademark (infringement).

Trademark owners do not acquire the exclusive ownership of words. They only obtain the right to use the mark in commerce and to prevent competitors in the same line of goods or services from using a confusingly similar mark. The same word can therefore be trademarked by different producers to label different kinds of goods. Examples are Delta Airlines and Delta Faucets.

Owners of famous marks have broader rights to use their marks than do owners of less-well-known marks. They can prevent uses of their marks by others on goods that do not even compete with the famous product.


[back to notice text]


Question: What does it mean to take all reasonable steps to protect a trademark?

Answer: If a trademark owner fails to police his or her mark, the owner may be deemed to have abandoned the mark or acquiesced in its misuse. A trademark is only protected while it serves to identify the source of goods or services.

If a trademark owner believes someone is infringing his or her trademark, the first thing the owner is likely to do is to write a "cease-and-desist" letter which asks the accused infringer to stop using the trademark. If the accused infringer refuses to comply, the owner may file a lawsuit in Federal or state court. The court may grant the plaintiff a preliminary injunction on use of the mark -- tell the infringer to stop using the trademark pending trial.

If the owner successfully proves trademark infringement in court, the court has the power to: order a permanent injunction; order monetary payment for profit the plaintiff can prove it would have made but for defendant's use of the mark; possibly increase this payment; possibly award a monetary payment of profits the defendant made while using the mark; and possibly order the defendant to pay the plaintiff's attorney fees in egregious cases of infringement.

Of course, the determination of infringement is actually one that will be made by the court, so a trademark owner is simply using a best guess about whether or not infringement actually has occurred. That best guess may be a good one, based on experience and expertise, or it may be a bad one that doesn't reflect any of the legitimate defenses that might exist. The law doesn't require the mark owner to sue everyone; it just requires the owner to keep his mark distinctive.


[back to notice text]


Question: What implication does alleged confusion have on claims of trademark infringement?

Answer: A mark that is confusingly similar so closely resembles a registered trademark that it is likely to confuse consumers as to the source of the product or service. Consumers could be likely to believe that the product with the confusingly similar mark is produced by the organization that holds the registered mark. Someone who holds a confusingly similar mark benefits from the good will associated with the registered mark and can lure customers to his/her product or service instead. Infringement is determined by whether your mark is confusingly similar to a registered mark. The factors that determine infringement include:

  • proof of actual confusion
  • strength of the established mark
  • proximity of the goods in the marketplace
  • similarity of the marks? sound
  • appearance and meaning
  • how the goods are marketed
  • type of product and how discerning the customer is
  • intent behind selecting the mark
  • likelihood of expansion in the market of the goods


[back to notice text]


Question: Where can I find state trademark law?

Answer: Each state has its own laws governing use of trademarks within its borders. To locate the trademark laws of the 50 states, use the Legal Information Institute links. Both legislation and court opinions create trademark rights and remedies.

If marks are used in interstate commerce, then federal law will also apply.


[back to notice text]


Question: Where can I find federal trademark law?

Answer: To be protected by federal trademark law, the marked goods and services must be used in interstate commerce. Federal trademark law is known as the Lanham Act. It protects marks that are registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office as well as those that are in use but never registered.

Court opinions and United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) regulations also interpret trademark rights and remedies. See the links to court sites provided by the Legal Information Insitute.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is copyright infringement? Are there any defenses?

Answer: Infringement occurs whenever someone who is not the copyright holder (or a licensee of the copyright holder) exercises one of the exclusive rights listed above.

The most common defense to an infringement claim is "fair use," a doctrine that allows people to use copyrighted material without permission in certain situations, such as quotations in a book review. To evaluate fair use of copyrighted material, the courts consider four factors:


  1. the purpose and character of the use
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work
  3. the amount and substantiality of copying, and
  4. the market effect.

(17 U.S.C. 107)

The most significant factor in this analysis is the fourth, effect on the market. If a copier's use supplants demand for the original work, then it will be very difficult for him or her to claim fair use. On the other hand, if the use does not compete with the original, for example because it is a parody, criticism, or news report, it is more likely to be permitted as "fair use."

Trademarks are generally subject to fair use in two situations: First, advertisers and other speakers are allowed to use a competitor's trademark when referring to that competitor's product ("nominative use"). Second, the law protects "fair comment," for instance, in parody.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is the difference between a trademark and a service mark?

Answer: Trademarks refer to goods and products, that is, physical commodities which may be natural or manufactured or produced, and which are sold or otherwise transported or distributed.

Service marks refer to intangible activities which are performed by one person for the benefit of a person or persons other than himself, either for pay or otherwise.

Because the legal rights are essentially the same, the term "trademark" is frequently used to refer to both types of marks.

To learn about other types of marks, see Chapter 100 of the USPTO's Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure.

To tell whether something is a good or a service, see 37 C.F.R. ?6.1.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is a trade name?

Answer: Answer: A trade name is the actual name of the company. It may or may not also be a trademark. Trademarks are used to label specific goods or services; trade names identify the organization itself. For example, "Ford Motor Company" is a trade name as well as a trademark. "Bronco" is a trademark only. In those cases, if the trade name is registered as a domain name, the name owner is protected against cyber-squatting under traditional trademark provisions and also under the newer Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) and the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) of ICANN.

If a trade name is not used as a trademark, it may still be protected under other kinds of laws (having different criteria and remedies), such as unfair competition. However, if the trade name is registered as domain name, the owner will not be protected against cyber-squatting under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) or the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) of ICANN since they both apply only to trademarks.


Topic maintained by USF Law School - IIP Justice Project

Topic Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers)
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts