Chilling Effects
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Topic HomeFAQsMonitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
USF Law School - IIP Justice Project
 Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Copyright > Notices > No Getty Without License (NoticeID 5151) Printer-friendly version

No Getty Without License

September 15, 2006

 

Sender Information:
Getty Images International Ltd
Sent by: [Private]
[Private]
NW1 0AG, UK

Recipient Information:
[Private]
[Private]
OX10 6DB, United Ki


Sent via: Post
Re: Re: Unauthorized Use Of Getty Images' Photographs

It has come to our attention that your are using an image (or images) represented by Getty Images for online promotional purposes. We have searched our records and have not found a valid license for the use of the image(s). Attached for your reference is a copy of the image(s) and use. We have also attached a demand representing the amount owed for unauthorized use of the image(s).

As you may know, use of an image without a valid license is considered copyright imfringement in voilation of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act of 1988.

The following action must be taen within 14 days of the date of this letter:

*If a valid license has been issued for the image(s) and use, please provide license information by emaling licensecompliance@gettyimages.com. This includes the sales order or invoice number of the license purchase. If the image(s) was licensed under an alternative company name (dba) or in the name of a third party, such as an advertising agency, please provide the company name and phone number. The subject line of the email must include your compnay name and customer number as they appear on the attached invoice.

*If you cannot provide proof that the image(s) has been properly licensed, you must cease and desist use of the image. In addition, payment for the attached demand must be received within 14 days of the date of this letter. The fees identified on the demand represent the minimum fees due for unauthorized image use and are not negotiable. Ceasing use of the image(s) does not eliminate liabilirt for payment of fees due. Payment details are included on the demand, and attional payment information is provided below.

*If you desire continued use of the image(s), please contact out License Compliance team at the number listed below. A new license must be issued for the image(s), or use of the image(s) must cease by September 29, 2006.

Please read the attached Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for more information related to this matter. If you do not respond within the timeframe provided, we wil presume that you do not intend to do so and will take action accordingly. For questions, or to settle your invoice, please contact LicenseCompliance@gettyimages.com or dial 0800 279 9258. Please also contact us immediately is you believe you have recieved this letter in error.

Getty Images is commited to investingating licensing infractions not only to protect out interest, but also to protect the intesters of the photographers whom we represent. We are committed to protecting the intellectual property rights and livelihood of the artists whose work we license. We must enforce our licensing conditions rigorously and feel that your cooperation regarding this matter should be promtly forthcoming. This letter is without prejudice to Getty Images' rights and remedies, all of which are expressly reserved.

Sincerely,

License Compliance Team
Getty Images
601 North 34th Street
Seattle, WA 98103 USA

____________________________________________________________________

Getty Images

September 15, 2006

Customer# ******

Re: Unauthorised Use of Getty Images' Photographs

Thank you for your attention to the attached demand and supporting documentation. In an effort to resolve this quickly, Getty Images is offering a one time discount of 15% on this invoice if the payment is received by September 29, 2006.

The total amount due, less the discount is 2,776.95 GBP

Sincerely,

License Compliance Team
Getty Images
101 Bayham Street
London NW1 0AG
GBR

____________________________________________________________________

Getty Images

Frequently Asked Questions

If you believe that you have recieved this notification in eror, please email us at licensecompliance@gettyimages.com or dia 0800 279 9258. Please be sure to provide the customer number found on your invoice, as well as your name and company contact information.

Who is Getty Images?
Getty Images represents some of the world's best photographers and filmmakers. Getty Images has contractual agreements with its photographers to represent certain Rights-Managed imagery exclusively and to license the use of these images to companies all over the world. The images Getty Images provides can be found in magazines, websites, and billboards, marketing collateral, product packaging and mobile devices, to name only a few. Getty Images, on behalf of itself and its represented photographers and artists, is committed to protecting its imagery from unauthorized use.

Somebody else created my company's website
Getty Images understands that a third-party, former employee, or itern may have been contracted to design and develop your company's website. However, if no licenses from Getty Images exist, the liability of any infringement ultimately falls on the company (the end user) who hired that third-party, employee, or intern. Getty Images recommends that your company contact the third-party, employee, or intern to see if any licenses from Getty Images surrounding the specific use of the images in question exist. Please provide an invoice number or sales order number and Getty Images will research as appropriate.

We have removed the images and now consider this matter closed
Getty Images appreciates the removal of its represented images from your company's website. However, removal of the images in question sloves only part of the issue, as Getty Images will continue to require full payment of the demand presented to settle the matter and avoid further escalation.

We found these images on the Internet or the Getty Images website and thought they were Royalty Free
The images in question are Rights-Managed images represented by Getty Images. The use of Rights-Minded images represented by Getty Images requries an appropriate license covering each and every use. Although Royalty-Free images from Getty Images are different from Rights-Minded images, a license must still be purchased for Royalty-Free image use.

We didn't know these images were represented by Getty Images and had to be licensed.
Unfortunately, despite the fact that your company may not have know, this does not excuse your compnay's unauthorized use, nor does it relieve you of the obligation to pay the invoice to settle Getty Images claim of copyright infringement.

We pushased these images from a company we found online as part of a web template
As the end user of Getty Images's imagery, you are ultimately responsible for insuring that you have obtained the appropriate rights to use the imagery. That means that if you acquire imagery from a web template provider or other such company, you are still liable for copyright infringement if that provider or other such company did not properly license the imagery for your use.

____________________________________________________________________

Note: The images in question were used for a 3 month period, having been removed in July. I found them on a website claiming them to be copyright-free. They were used for a non-profit website telling people how to use aromatherpy in the home. I am not a company, just a housewife, and am very distressed at having recieved a demand for money with no previous notice of the images being copyrighted. Is there a way to find out if images are copyrighted if you are getting them from a 3rd party website, which claims them to be copyright-free?

 
FAQ: Questions and Answers

[back to notice text]


Question: What is a valid copyright license?

Answer: A valid license is an agreement where the copyright owner retains his or her ownership of the rights involved, but allows a third party to exercise some or all of those rights without fear of a copyright infringement suit. A license is preferred over an assignment of rights where the copyright holder wishes to maintain some ownership over the rights, or wishes to exercise continuing control over how the third party uses the copyright holder's rights.


[back to notice text]


Question: What is copyright infringement? Are there any defenses?

Answer: Infringement occurs whenever someone who is not the copyright holder (or a licensee of the copyright holder) exercises one of the exclusive rights listed above.

The most common defense to an infringement claim is "fair use," a doctrine that allows people to use copyrighted material without permission in certain situations, such as quotations in a book review. To evaluate fair use of copyrighted material, the courts consider four factors:


  1. the purpose and character of the use
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work
  3. the amount and substantiality of copying, and
  4. the market effect.

(17 U.S.C. 107)

The most significant factor in this analysis is the fourth, effect on the market. If a copier's use supplants demand for the original work, then it will be very difficult for him or her to claim fair use. On the other hand, if the use does not compete with the original, for example because it is a parody, criticism, or news report, it is more likely to be permitted as "fair use."

Trademarks are generally subject to fair use in two situations: First, advertisers and other speakers are allowed to use a competitor's trademark when referring to that competitor's product ("nominative use"). Second, the law protects "fair comment," for instance, in parody.


[back to notice text]


Question: Where can I find the text of the U.S. Copyright Act?

Answer: The federal Copyright Act may be found at http://www.loc.gov/copyright/title17/.


[back to notice text]


Question: What does it mean if the cease-and-desist letter I got has a copyright notice?

Answer: Copyright can be claimed on any original expression, but some uses of copyrighted works, including use for commentary and criticism, are fair uses, not infringement. It is highly unlikely that someone could sue successfully for the posting of a cease-and-desist notice (most notices are minimally creative; the use is for purposes of commentary and research; the amount used is necessary to the understanding; and there is no effect on a "market" for cease-and-desist letters).


Topic maintained by USF Law School - IIP Justice Project

Topic Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers)
Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts