Chilling Effects
Home Weather Reports Report Receiving a Cease and Desist Notice Search the Database Topics
Sending
Topic HomeFAQsMonitoring the legal climate for Internet activity
Santa Clara University School of Law High Tech Law Institute
 Chilling Effects Clearinghouse > Trade Secret > Notices > MediaDefender's Trade Secrets and Confidential Information Printer-friendly version

September 17, 2007

 

Sender Information:
MediaDefender
Sent by: [Private]
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
San Diego, CA, 92130, USA

Recipient Information:
[Private]
GPIO.org


Sent via: email
Re: MediaDefender's Trade Secrets and Confidential Information

Dear [Private]:

This firm represents MediaDefender in certain intellectual property and other legal matters. Recently, despite security precautions by our client, a person or persons illegally accessed MediaDefender's email and other files, and stole trade secrets and other confidential information including social security numbers and personal information of certain of its employees. We have learned that tis information, in-whole or i-part, has been posted without authorization on internet sites including gpio.org.

The unauthorized access, use, display and/or misappropriation of MediaDefender's trade secrets and confidential information is subjet to civil remedies and criminal penalties pursuant to the following federal and California statutes that address the unauthorized access of proprietary computer systems:

(1) the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. s 1030, which provides for a fine or imprisonment up to ten years, or both, for a first offense;

(2) the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. s 2701, which provides for a fine or imprisonment up to one year, or both, for a first offense; and

(3) the California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, Cal. Penal Code s 502, which provides for a fine up to $10,000 and imprisonment up to three years.

These statutes clearly render such conduct unlawful, and could result in liability for gpio.org complicity in distributing, using, displaying or otherwise making available, MediaDefender's trade secrets and confidential information. These statutes could also establish the predicate wrongful conduct for asserting civil claims against Gpio.org under various civil statutory and tort theories.

We request the you immediately and permanently cease and desist from posting, distributing or otherwise making available MediaDefender's trade secrets and confidential information, and provide us with written confirmation regarding the same. If necessary, MediaDefender is prepared to pursue its civil and criminal remedies in this matter to the fullest extent under the law, and to seek not only injunctive relief, but also actual, statutory, and punitive damages, as well as attorneys' fees.

Not withstanding the foregoing, please recognize that we are providing you with further notice to preserve all evidence and other information relating to this issue while we investigate the matter further. Your failure to preserve such information and/or your alteration, concealment, or transfer of any evidence pertaining to this matter is considered spoliation of evidence and could subject you to both civil and criminal liability. This letter is not intended to contain a complete statement of fact with respect to the subject matter hereof, and MediaDefender does not waive any legal or equitable rights or remedies available to it, all of which are expressly reserved.

We look forward to hearing from you promptly.

Very truly yours,

[private]

for SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP

image pages: 1 2

 
FAQ: Questions and Answers

[back to notice text]


Question: What can be kept as a trade secret?

Answer: A trade secret is information that provides a business with a competitive advantage. The following section provides examples of circumstances where trade secret protection was approved or denied. Courts have provided trade secret protection to formulas, patterns, plans, designs, physical devices, processes, software, and ?know-how.? Examples of these trade secret categories are provided below. Please keep in mind that different courts may reach contrary conclusions concerning trade secret status with respect to what may appear to be identical matters. You may wish to consult a lawyer in your local area to obtain information on your state?s laws.


  • FORMULA:

    A formula (i.e., a recipe that allows one to create a product) can be a trade secret. One of the most familiar examples of a trade secret formula is the Coca-Cola formula. This formula gives the Coca-Cola Company a significant business advantage in the soda market, as there is no other soda that tastes the same. The Coca-Cola Company has put numerous security measures in place to keep its formula a secret. In fact, the Coca Cola Company ensures that no one knows every step of the formula!

    Other common formulas found to be trade secrets in the food, drug, and cosmetics industry include formulas for butter flavoring, cheese, breakfast cereal, seasoning for fried chicken, special diet rations for dogs, mixed alcoholic beverages, lipstick, and hair conditioner. On the other hand, formulas for a lemon-flavored soft drink, recipes and cooking procedures for common dishes such as BBQ chicken and bakery goods were all denied trade secret protection.


  • PATTERNS, PLANS, & DESIGNS
  • :

    A pattern, plan or design can be a trade secret. For example, courts have found the following to be trade secrets: circuitry for an advanced minicomputer, color TV circuitry, schematics for an analog circuit, plans and specifications for gears and rollers of a photo-processing machine, plans for drilling equipment, plans and designs for a veneer dryer, molds for the manufacture of street markers, and a design for a grating.


  • PHYSICAL DEVICE
  • :

    A physical device used in manufacturing can be a trade secret. Examples of these devices found to be trade secrets include: a device for manufacturing radio parts, machinery and equipment used to manufacture polyethylene, machinery and equipment used to manufacture saw grade diamonds, a computer tool used to service microprocessor-based elevators, a tool for making a pressure-sensing mechanism, a machine for inking carbon paper and ribbons, and an adhesive-tape machine.


  • PROCESS
  • :

    A process, method or technique used to make the final end product can also be a trade secret. The following is an example of using a process as a trade secret: Suppose you work at a hair salon and when a customer wants you to dye his or her hair, you use a hair dye formula that is pre-bottled. However, you have also developed your own unique process in applying the formula to hair so that the hair color stays longer. Because your process gives you a competitive business advantage, you may obtain trade secret protection of your dye process.

    Other examples of processes found to be trade secrets include: a process to manufacture foam crash pads, a process to treat metal, a process to manufacture fiberglass, a method and procedure to manufacture epoxy resin rods, a process to manufacture potassium sulfate, and a process for an environmentally sound method to manufacture coated paper.

    Keep in mind that processes and methods incident with a patent may still constitute a trade secret. See below for more information on patents and trade secrets.


  • ?KNOW-HOW?
  • :

    "Know-how" can be a trade secret. A method or technique in some cases might fall into the ?process? category, but many methods and techniques can be better described as ?know-how" (i.e., information and experiential expertise related to using formulas or processes.) When asserting methods and techniques in this category, however, one must be very specific in describing the method or technique. Examples of trade secrets in this area include: know-how pertaining to the construction of plant chemicals, methods for testing procedures to assure the quality of raw material, know-how to ascertain whether CAT scanning equipment and components are operating according to specifications and to identify malfunctions, and methods to manufacture typewriters.


    [back to notice text]


    Question: What does ?misappropriating? a trade secret mean?

    Answer: One has ??misappropriated? a trade secret if he or she has acquired, disclosed, or used the trade secret information without the permission of the holder, where such activities were done through improper means (e.g., the trade secret information was stolen from the holder) or in breach of an obligation of confidentiality or non-use. If you have received a letter stating that you have ?misappropriated? a trade secret (see SAMPLE LETTERS; also see TRADE SECRET LAWS), you should consult with an attorney.


    [back to notice text]


    Question: What do courts consider in determining if a trade secret exists?

    Answer: Courts usually consider the following three factors in determining whether you have a trade secret:

    (1) Is the information deemed to be a "trade secret" valuable to the business?
    Only secret information can be protected by trade secret law. Secrecy is typically determined by evaluating whether or not the information is "generally known" or "readily ascertainable." If the information is secret, you must consider whether the secret information is valuable to your business. How would you rank its value? Courts tend to find that the information is a trade secret if the information is so valuable as to significantly impact the operations of a business.


    (2) What steps have been taken to keep the information secret?
    Trade secret laws require that you have taken some action to keep your information a secret. The security procedure taken to protect the information is often the most important evidence that the information constitutes a trade secret. For example, courts have often found that restricting access (on a "need to know" basis) to any sensitive information is a factor that helps to meet this requirement. Courts have also found that physical security, such as keeping written trade secret information in a locked drawer and granting very limited access to it, can meet this requirement. Generally, holders of trade secrets develop a formal system for safeguarding their trade secret information. Such a system can include, for example, reviewing information to be sure that the secret information is not included in documents sent to customers and competitors. In addition, proprietary notices can be placed on all documents containing information related to trade secrets and strict confidentiality provisions can be written into all consulting, manufacturing, employment, and/or non-disclosure agreements.


    (3) To what extent do employees and others involved in the business know about the information? What about people outside the business?
    The extent that those in your business and those outside the business have access to the information can affect a court's decision as to whether you have a legal trade secret. Generally, courts have found the information to be public knowledge and not a trade secret if people who do not have a need to know the information have access to it. This is especially true if many people outside the company are familiar with the information.


    [back to notice text]


    Question: What is this laundry list of things the C&D says will happen if I don't obey?

    Answer: Your opponent may describe a parade of horribles to demonstrate with exquisite detail what it will do to you unless you capitulate. This list generally includes, but is not limited to:
    (1) ceasing use of the allegedly infringing mark or surrendering the domain name;
    (2) rendering an accounting;
    (3) posting corrective advertising;
    (4) obtaining an injunction;
    (5) recovering costs and fees.

    Though these things sound awful, they are not medieval tortures (although that may be a function of the fact that Torquemada never thought of them).

    Ceasing use of the mark is self-explanatory: your opponent wants you to stop using the mark. Your opponent might also ask you to surrender your domain name if they believe the domain name causes (or is likely to cause) confusion with their trademark. For example, under ICANN rules (the UDRP), you may have to surrender your domain name if the following three conditions are satisfied:
    (1) your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to your opponent?s;
    (2) you have no legitimate right or interest in the name (in other words, you are not using the name to conduct a bona fide business or for non-commercial fair use purposes); and
    (3) your name is registered and used in bad faith.

    An accounting basically means that you disclose the following information to your opponent:
    (1) the date you began using the allegedly infringing mark;
    (2) the names of individuals who knew of the use when it began;
    (3) the amount of traffic at your web site or business at your store; and
    (4) your profits and revenues during the time you used the allegedly infringing mark.

    Corrective advertising means you give notice to the public that you were using a mark confusingly similar to your opponent?s, and that you are not affiliated with your opponent.

    An injunction is a judicial order to do something. An injunction can prevent you from using the allegedly infringing trademark.

    Some provisions of the Lanham Act permit a trademark holder to recover attorney?s fees and court costs from an infringer.

    That your opponent has listed these various remedies does not mean that it is entitled to them; do not confuse the smorgasbord of legal options with your opponent?s right to inflict any of them on you.


    [back to notice text]


    Question: What does the "reservation of rights" language mean? What are they "waiving" at me?

    Answer: Many C&Ds will say something like, "This letter shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any rights or remedies, which are expressly reserved." This is just legalese for saying, "Even if you do what we ask in this letter, we can still sue you later." The language is standard; do not be alarmed. Litigation is extremely unpleasant, and unless your opponent is irrational (always a distinct possibility, of course), it will not bring litigation after it has obtained what it wants.


    Topic maintained by Santa Clara University School of Law High Tech Law Institute

    Topic Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers)
    Chilling Effects Clearinghouse - www.chillingeffects.org
    disclaimer / privacy / about us & contacts