DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google

sender

Simon Montana-Hollosi

[Private] , , , GB Sent on June 26, 2014

recipient

Google, Inc.

[Private] Mountain View, CA, 94043, US Received on June 26, 2014

Re: Websearch Infringement Notification via Online Form Complaint

Sent via: online form

Notice Type:: Dmca

Action taken:: Yes

Copyright claim #1

Kind of Work: movie

Description I requested for http://www.simonmontanahollosi.piczo.com/ to be removed however did not know DCMA letter would be publish. I am happy to file a counter-notice if it removes the original DCMA notice completely (right to forget). Thank you and look forward to your reply Kind Regards Simon Montana-Hollosi
Original URLs:
1. http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=1017269
Allegedly Infringing URLs:
1. http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=1017269

Related FAQs

What is "willful copyright infringement"?

Willful infringement occurs when the infringer knows that the material they are copying is protected by copyright. In many cases, the penalties for copyright infringement are greater if the infringement is willful.

What are screenshots, and is using them copyright infringement?

Screen shots or screen dumps are still images taken from computer programs. Screen shots are often used in training materials to explain how to use a computer program. Screen shots are protected by copyright law if the original work is protected. This is due to the fact that screenshots are viewed as derivative works.

The US Copyright Act of 1976, Section 101, says:

A "derivative work" is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a "derivative work."

What is a copyright notice?

A copyright notice is placed on copies of a work by the owner in order to inform the public that the owner - an individual or business - holds copyright in the work. The public is then "on notice" that the work is copyrighted and unauthorized copying may infringe the copyright owner's rights.

Generally, a proper copyright notice must contain: 1. The symbol ©, the word “Copyright”, or the abbreviation “Copr.” 2. The year of first publication of the work. 3. The name of the copyright owner, a recognizable abbreviation of the copyright owner's name, or a generally known alternative designation of the owner.

The notice must also be placed on copies of a work so that they give reasonable notice of the claim of copyright.

The legal effect of proper copyright notice is to prevent a defendant in a copyright infringement suit to raise a defense based on innocent infringement. Simply, it prevents a defendant from saying "I had no idea that this work was copyrighted and I should not have to pay damages for willful infringement."

The specific notice provisions are set forth in 17 U.S.C. § 401-406.

What are statutory damages?

A copyright owner can only sue for infringement on a work whose copyright was registered with the Copyright Office, and can get statutory damages and attorney's fees only if the copyright registration was filed before infringement or within three months of first publication. (17 U.S.C. 411 and 412) (17 U.S.C. 411 and 412)

A copyright owner may avoid proving actual damage by electing a statutory damage recovery of up to $30,000 or, where the court determines that the infringement occurred willfully, up to $150,000. The actual amount will be based upon what the court in its discretion considers just. (17 U.S.C. 504). (17 U.S.C. 504)

What is penalty of perjury?

Perjury is the act of lying or making verifiably false statements on a material matter under oath or affirmation in a court of law or in any of various sworn statements in writing. Perjury is a crime because the witness has sworn to tell the truth and, for the credibility of the court, witness testimony must be relied on as being truthful. The rules for perjury apply when a person has made a statement under penalty of perjury, even if the person has not been sworn or affirmed as a witness before an appropriate official.

What rights are protected by copyright law?

The purpose of copyright law is to encourage creative work by granting a temporary monopoly in an author's original creations. This monopoly takes the form of six rights in areas where the author retains exclusive control. These rights are:

(1) the right of reproduction (i.e., copying), (2) the right to create derivative works, (3) the right to distribution, (4) the right to performance, (5) the right to display, and (6) the digital transmission performance right.

The law of copyright protects the first two rights in both private and public contexts, whereas an author can only restrict the last four rights in the public sphere. Claims of infringement must show that the defendant exercised one of these rights. For example, if I create unauthorized videotape copies of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and distribute them to strangers on the street, then I have infringed both the copyright holder's rights of reproduction and distribution. If I merely re-enact The Wrath of Khan for my family in my home, then I have not infringed on the copyright. Names, ideas and facts are not protected by copyright.

Trademark law, in contrast, is designed to protect consumers from confusion as to the source of goods (as well as to protect the trademark owner's market). To this end, the law gives the owner of a registered trademark the right to use the mark in commerce without confusion. If someone introduces a trademark into the market that is likely to cause confusion, then the newer mark infringes on the older one. The laws of trademark infringement and dilution protect against this likelihood of confusion. Trademark protects names, images and short phrases.

Infringement regulation protects against confusion about the origin of goods. The plaintiff in an infringement suit must show that defendant's use of the mark is likely to cause such a confusion. For instance, if I were an unscrupulous manufacturer, I might attempt to capitalize on the fame of Star Trek by creating a line of 'Spock Activewear.' If consumers could reasonably believe that my activewear was produced or endorsed by the owners of the Spock trademark, then I would be liable for infringement.

The law of trademark dilution protects against confusion concerning the character of a registered trademark. Suppose I created a semi-automatic assault rifle and marketed it as 'The Lt. Uhura 5000.' Even if consumers could not reasonably believe that the Star Trek trademark holders produced this firearm, the trademark holders could claim that my use of their mark harmed the family-oriented character of their mark. I would be liable for dilution.

What constitutes copyright infringement?

Subject to certain 17 U.S.C. ?106. It is also copyright infringement to violate the "moral rights" of an author as defined by 17 U.S.C. 106A. Moral rights are discussed here.

What's wrong with removing a copyright notice?

Section 1202 of the Copyright Act prohbits unauthorized removal or alteration of copyright management information, which might include a copyright notice.

What is defamation?

Generally, defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. State laws often define defamation in specific ways. Libel is a written defamation; slander is a spoken defamation.

Speech that involves a public figure--such as a corporation--is only defamatory if it is false and said with "actual malice", meaning with knowledge of the statement's falsity or in reckless disregard for the truth. It also must be factual rather than an expression of an opinion. In the United States, because of our strong free speech protections, it is extremely difficult to prove defamation of a public figure.

Truth is an absolute defense to a claim of defamation, but of course, the truth can be difficult and expensive to prove.

Opinions are not defamatory, but the issue is whether a reasonable reader or listener could understand the statement in question as asserting a statement of verifiable fact, not whether it is labeled as "opinion."

Do the DMCA 512 provisions apply to page-rank hijacking or sites getting higher page ranks?

[not yet answered]

Do I need to register my copyright?

You get copyright automatically when you create a work and "fix" or record it. Registration with the Copyright Office is not a prerequisite, but it can give you additional protection: you can only get statutory damages for infringement of a registered copyright. A U.S. author must also register before filing a copyright lawsuit.

What are the communication requirements that Section 512 imposes on OSPs, complainants, and alleged infringers?

Each of the parties -- the complainant, the Online Service Provider (OSP), and the alleged infringer -- has the right to communicate with the other parties. In addition, OSPs and complainants are required to engage in certain communications in order to take advantage of the DMCA's notice-and-takedown and safe harbor provisions.

The complainant starts the Sec. 512 process by notifying the Online Service Provider (OSP) or the OSP's agent in writing of a copyright infringement. Section 512(c)(3)(A)(iii) sets out the requirements for notice to OSPs. Under this section, the complainant must specifically identify the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material.

Section 512(d)(3) sets out the procedure for contacting information location tools, such as search engines. Under Sec. 512(d), the complainant must identify the reference or link to the allegedly infringing material, and must provide enough information for the search engine to locate the link.

The complainant is not required to contact the alleged infringer at any time. [§ 512(h)(5).] However, complainants who do wish to contact the infringer, or to file suit on an infringer, may use the Sec. 512(h) subpoena process to require an OSP provide its customers' identifying information to the complainant.

The OSP has two separate sets of communication obligations. First, the OSP is generally required to establish policies regarding copyright infringement and repeat infringers and to inform subscribers and account holders about those policies as well as about the actions taken against repeat infringers. [§ 512(i)(1)(A).] This applies both to Sec. 512(c) ISPs and Sec. 512(d) information location tools.

Second, once an OSP receives a Section 512 takedown notice, it is required to notify its subscriber that it has disabled access to the allegedly infringing material. [§ 512(g)(2)(A).]

A recipient is not required to respond in any way to Sec. 512 notices from OSPs or complainants. However, without a recipient response, the OSP will generally remove or disable access to the material, possibly even disabling an ISP account. To avoid this, the recipient may file a counter-notification with the OSP, denying that the material infringes copyright. [§ 512(g)] If an OSP receives a counter-notification, then the service provider must notify the complainant that it will cease disabling access in 10 business days unless the complainant obtains a court-imposed restraining order. [§ 512(g)(2)(C)]

What is criminal copyright infringement?

As defined by 15 USC section 506, criminal copyright infringement occurs if a person willfully infringes upon a copyright and it was done under any of the following circumstances: 1) for commercial advantage or private financial gain; 2) where the copies have a retail value of at least $1,000 and were made within a 180-day period; or 3) by distributing copyrighted work where the infringer knew or should have known the work was intended for public distribution. If found guilty, the infringer can be imprisoned for up to 10 years, depending on the type of infringement

Can a copyright owner find out the identity of the individual responsible for the allegedly infringing material?

The safe harbor provisions permit a copyright owner to subpoena the identity of the individual allegedly responsible for the infringing activities. [512(h)] Such a subpoena is granted on the condition that the information about the individual's identity will only be used in relation to the protection of the intellectual property rights of the copyright owner. [512(h)(2)(C)]

The DMCA subpoena provision does not apply to requests for the identities of users of ISP conduit 512(a) services, but only to users of hosting or linking, for which a takedown may be sent under 512(c)(3)(A). Thus DMCA subpoenas cannot be used to find the identities of users engaged in peer-to-peer filesharing. Recording Industry Assoc. of America v. Verizon Internet Svcs., Inc.

What kinds of things are copyrightable?

In order for material to be copyrightable, it must be original and must be in a fixed medium.

Only material that originated with the author can support a copyright. Items from the public domain which appear in a work, as well as work borrowed from others, cannot be the subject of an infringement claim. Also, certain stock material might not be copyrightable, such as footage that indicates a location like the standard shots of San Francisco in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home. Also exempted are stock characters like the noisy punk rocker who gets the Vulcan death grip in Star Trek IV.

The requirement that works be in a fixed medium leaves out certain forms of expression, most notably choreography and oral performances such as speeches. For instance, if I perform a Klingon death wail in a local park, my performance is not copyrightable. However, if I film the performance, then the film is copyrightable.

Single words and short phrases are generally not protected by copyright, even when the name has been "coined" or newly-created by the mark owner. Logos that include original design elements can be protected under copyright or under trademark. Otherwise, words, phrases and titles may be protected only by trademark.

Re: Websearch Infringement Notification via Online Form Complaint

Copyright claim #1